After conducting my research I’ve come to the conclusion
that in order to achieve the best results I’m going to have to use more than
one of the tools of gathering information.
Conducting surveys is a good idea. I found it the best way
to see patterns and trends among specific questions. The down side to
conducting surveys is that you obviously only get answers to the questions you
ask. What I mean is that you can’t really find out enough about one situation
or the reasons behind an answer. I also think that surveys are a bit too
impersonal, it’s easy to not quite tell the whole truth and people may be
unwilling to fill one in therefore it is difficult to get people to participate.
They are however useful to find patterns and problems which could be of use to
research into and also useful as evidence of problems.
Interviewing others is a lot more difficult than I had
originally thought. I, like many others on the course found it was difficult to
keep up with the note taking whilst asking questions. A Dictaphone is a very
good idea and would also be useful as evidence for the inquiry.
Sometimes it was
difficult to stick to the questions I originally wanted to ask and I realised
that I needed to really plan the questions to get the information off the
participant that I truly wanted.
I also found it hard to get a happy medium of formality. If
the interview was too formal then the interviewee was less likely to relax into
the interview and the information I would then receive from them would be a bit
like the survey – they would be unlikely to elaborate on their answers.
However, if the interview was too informal then we were more likely to go off
at tangents and stray from the questions that I was supposed to be asking and
in some cases the candidate may also not take the interview as seriously as I
would have perhaps needed them too.
Observations were pleasing in the results. I found that if I
was taking part in the situation and not an “onlooker” that I would get the
natural results that I would be after and a lot of my questions would be
answered as I’d see certain situations happen.
Observations will be a great way for me to gather
information for my inquiry as I will already be in a situation with my work
where this will be possible while I am taking part in rehearsals.
I have already noticed situations where dancers are at
possible risk of injury such as:
- Not keeping warm in the rehearsal when not being used.
- Repetition of movements whilst learning choreography.
- Girls rehearsing in heels for substantial amounts of time.
I have also noticed situations where the risk of injury has
been reduced:
- A full cast warm up takes place everyday
- Dancers are given a good amount of time to rest between rehearsals.
- There are enough swings to cover so less pressure to dance through injury.
It would be beneficial if I could also observe other companies
in order to compare different company rules and policies. This way I will be
able to discover where most of the injury risks lie, if and how different
companies do certain things to prevent injuries and what needs to be bought to
dancers’ attention in order to help themselves hopefully prevent or work
through injury.
Conducting focus groups was quite intimidating. I only
managed a couple of people at a time as I really didn’t feel confident enough with
more people. I found that the small groups I interviewed flowed quite well
although maybe someone with a stronger opinion would lead the other person into
agreeing with what they were saying if perhaps they didn’t or didn’t as
strongly as they did. I would like to try an online focus group to discuss with
different associates who belong to different companies. This will take a lot of
planning as there could be issues with time zones and the participants
obtaining internet access but would be beneficial to again gather information
and compare the different results.
Prior to piloting the different tools of gathering
information I was sure that the data I would need to collect for my inquiry
would be qualitative as I would need to know details behind injury and personal
situations. However through taking surveys and also through reading up on
previous literature that has been written about dance injury I have learned how
important gathering quantitative data will also be for my inquiry. I hope to
compare the results and numbers to inquiries that have taken place in the past.
How do my results differ from their findings? Do dancers know more now? Has anything
changed? What actions/ technology have been put in to place to help prevent
injury for dancers and is it working?